- Chapter
- Kurt G. Calia , Partner, Covington & Burling LLP - "The Role of Patent Lawyers, both Generally and in the Context of Markman Hearings"
- Alexander J. Hadjis, Chair, Patent Litigation Group, Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal LLP - "Making an Impact on the Entire Case through Effective Markman Hearings"
- Richard T. Redano PC, Partner, Duane Morris LLP - "The Impact of Markman Hearings on Patent Litigation"
- Matthew B. Lehr, Partner, Davis Polk & Wardwell - "The Art of Persuasion in Markman Hearings"
- John R. Crossan, Partner, Chapman and Cutler LLP - "Preparing for and Conducting a Markman Hearing for Claim Interpretation in U.S. Patent Infringement"
- Tim Headley, Partner, GardereWynne Sewell LLP - "Making a Strong Argument"
- James P. Flynn, Partner and Shareholder, Epstein Becker & Green - "Markmanship: Hitting the Bull’s Eye in Your Patent Case"
- Appendix
- Summary Judgment Motion Resulting in Technology Licensing Corp. v. Thomson Inc., 77 U.S.P.Q.2d 1269 (E.D. Calif. 2005), Decision
- Markman Brief Resulting in Thermal Technologies Inc. v. Dade Serv. Corp., 74 U.S.P.Q.2d 1137 (M.D. Fla., 2004), Decision
- U.S. Patent Numbers 5148980 and 5176318
- Plaintiffs’ Proposed Claim Term Constructions
- Defendant’s Proposed Claim Term Constructions
- Markman Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
- Markman Brief in Reply to Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
- Markman Brief
|